Re: timestamp datatype cleanup

From: "Warren Turkal" <turkal(at)google(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp datatype cleanup
Date: 2008-03-21 16:44:19
Message-ID: 8c3d85470803210944v2c969d95i4dbb266b58b5f231@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Warren Turkal" <turkal(at)google(dot)com> writes:
>
> > I have to say, I am wondering more and more how real the need is for
> > the two representations of timestamps. Would it be better to deprecate
> > the float format or at least make the int64 format the default?
>
> This was gone over in great detail just recently ... didn't you see
> that thread?

I actually hadnn't seen the resolution until just now. Thanks for
pointing it out.

wt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-03-21 16:53:44 Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-21 15:53:01 Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1