RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Date: 2001-03-13 00:02:49
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3311@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > FSYNC: 257tps
> > O_DSYNC: 333tps
> >
> > Just(?) 30% faster, -:(
>
> First of all, if you ask me, that is one hell of an improvement :-)

Of course -:) But tfsync tests were more promising -:)
Probably we should update XLogWrite to write() more than 1 block,
but Tom should apply his patches first (btw, did you implement
"log file size" condition for checkpoints, Tom?).

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-13 00:15:32 Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-03-12 23:57:55 xlog patches reviewed