| From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Zeugswetter Andreas SB'" <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, "'dom(at)idealx(dot)com'" <dom(at)idealx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd) |
| Date: | 2001-01-24 19:19:27 |
| Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D32B4@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > 1. For 1st phase we'll place into log "prepared-to-commit" record
> > and this phase will be accomplished after record is
> > flushed on disk.
> > At this point transaction may be committed at any time because of
> > all its modifications are logged. But it still may be rolled back
> > if this phase failed on other sites of distributed system.
>
> 1st phase will also need to do all the delayed constraint checks,
> and all other work a commit currently does, that could possibly lead
> to a transaction abort. The 2nd phase of 2phase commit is not
It was assumed.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-01-24 19:23:25 | RE: WAL documentation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-01-24 19:03:25 | Re: postgresql.conf and postgres options |