RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, selkovjr(at)mcs(dot)anl(dot)gov, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Date: 2001-01-11 17:35:07
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D325B@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The RelFileNodeEquals() bug we found on Monday proves that no one had
> yet done enough stress-testing on 7.1 to discover that multiple
> databases were broken. Think about that for awhile before
> you campaign for inserting untested new features at this point.
> We need to focus on TESTING, people, not new features.

I mostly sure that Oleg' changes touch *only* gist subdir (Oleg?)
so *nothing* will be broken in other areas. That's why I don't
object new gist in 7.1.

RelFileNodeEquals is quite another thing, thanks for fix again -:)

Vadim

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2001-01-11 17:35:12 Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-11 17:25:16 Re: drop table and pg_proc