RE: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Jarmo Paavilainen'" <netletter(at)comder(dot)com>, MYSQL <mysql(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare
Date: 2000-12-29 19:02:39
Message-ID: 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3221@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> "PostgreSQL*" is postgres whith queries inside transactions.
> But as long as transactions are broken in PostgreSQL you cant
> use them in real life (if a query fails inside a transactions
> block, PostgreSQL "RollBack"s the whole transaction block, and
> thats broken. You can not convince me of anything else).

Nevertheless you shouldn't use word "broken" -:)
Right word - "savepoints are not implemented".

Vadim

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert D. Nelson 2000-12-29 19:08:00 RE: MySQL and PostgreSQL speed compare
Previous Message Steve Wolfe 2000-12-29 18:11:01 Re: Performance Tuning, hardware-wise