| From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-27 19:42:35 |
| Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C3D@SECTORBASE1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I actually meant I thought we were going to have a pg_class column
> called relversion that held the currently active version for that
> relation.
>
> Yes, the file name will be pg_class_oid.version_id.
>
> Is that OK?
We recently discussed pure *unique-id* file names...
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-27 19:45:42 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-27 19:40:27 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |