Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments

Everyone is most definitely encouraged to just pick up a patch. In the
past we've found people are often reluctant to do so especially for
patche that seem to require specialized background. The rrreviewers
are there to give people that extra encouragement.

--
Greg

On 2009-07-17, at 5:02 AM, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:44:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:42:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Jaime
>>>> Casanova<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>>>>> should i wait until it gets committed or will you assign me some
>>>>> other patch?
>>>>
>>>> How about this one next?
>>>>
>>>> Make pg_restore --clean to delete existing large objects
>>>
>>> Can I have one, too? My patch submitter just concluded his patch
>>> needs
>>> reworking.
>>
>> Sure, how 'bout DefaultACLs?
>
> For future reference, would it be easier if a rrreviewer-in-need-of-
> work just
> picked a patch, or would you like to be the Gatekeeper? (Insert
> reference to
> The Keymaster here...)
>
> --
> Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
> End Point Corporation
> http://www.endpoint.com