From: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, "pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments |
Date: | 2009-07-17 04:02:52 |
Message-ID: | 20090717040252.GD12076@eddie |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:44:51PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:42:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Jaime
>>> Casanova<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>>>> should i wait until it gets committed or will you assign me some
>>>> other patch?
>>>
>>> How about this one next?
>>>
>>> Make pg_restore --clean to delete existing large objects
>>
>> Can I have one, too? My patch submitter just concluded his patch needs
>> reworking.
>
> Sure, how 'bout DefaultACLs?
For future reference, would it be easier if a rrreviewer-in-need-of-work just
picked a patch, or would you like to be the Gatekeeper? (Insert reference to
The Keymaster here...)
--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-07-17 04:36:32 | Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-17 03:44:51 | Re: CF 2009-07: initial reviewing assignments |