archiving binary releases

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: archiving binary releases
Date: 2009-01-10 14:16:20
Message-ID: 8CE5982C6C0526B00CCCF1E9@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm going to clean out the binary archives, unless someone has a really
compelling reason why we need to keep binaries from 7.0? Or why we need to
keep RC / Beta binaries?

My thought was to keep the last version on each branch, up until what we
officially support, and get rid of the 'interum releases' (ie. v8.3RC1) ...

This doesn't affect the source archives, so if someone *really* needs v7.1.1
for whatever reason, they can build from source ...

I won't do anything until next week, just signalling intent ...

- --
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAklorbQACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMnLwCgtOW41beCz2I39Uw0lItl2Z+g
8nsAoNVpSnH/6/44Mfv/u+RmFjaj8IkM
=GnI0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harald Armin Massa 2009-01-10 14:24:01 Re: archiving binary releases
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2009-01-09 21:48:22 Re: Denver PUG mailing list