| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "codeWarrior" <gpatnude(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Anyone still using the sql_inheritance parameter? |
| Date: | 2007-03-21 16:14:42 |
| Message-ID: | 8989.1174493682@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
"codeWarrior" <gpatnude(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> What is the potential impact for the "ONLY" qualifier ??? None I would
> expect, as the "ONLY" qualifier effectively sets SQL_INHERITANCE = off for
> that specific query --
> What about "decorated" table names: i.e: "SELECT * FROM cities*" ??? Do we
> get to keep this feature ?
Sure, I see no need to muck with either of those syntaxes.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Benjamin Arai | 2007-03-21 16:15:11 | Re: multi terabyte fulltext searching |
| Previous Message | Benjamin Arai | 2007-03-21 16:14:31 | Re: multi terabyte fulltext searching |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2007-03-21 16:50:15 | Re: Anyone still using the sql_inheritance parameter? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-21 16:13:06 | Re: Anyone still using the sql_inheritance parameter? |