| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MemSet inline for newNode |
| Date: | 2002-11-10 14:01:06 |
| Message-ID: | 8937.1036936866@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have applied this patch to inline MemSet for newNode.
> I will make another commit to make more general use of palloc0.
Refresh my memory on why either of these was a good idea?
> This was already discussed on hackers.
And this was not the approach agreed to, IIRC. What you've done has
eliminated the possibility of optimizing away the controlling tests
in MemSet.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Iavor Raytchev | 2002-11-10 14:14:15 | Re: The database system is in recovery mode |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-11-10 13:54:37 | Re: The database system is in recovery mode |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-11-10 19:49:24 | Re: pgsql-server/src Makefile.global.in makefiles/ ... |
| Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2002-11-10 13:04:00 | pgcrypto/openssl fix |