Re: Postgres (selection of thesis topic)

From: "Alexander Staubo" <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: "Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet(dot)dhaliwal01(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres (selection of thesis topic)
Date: 2007-05-02 16:03:59
Message-ID: 88daf38c0705020903v91f46e2v3dcfc89cf9380ce3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/2/07, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> wrote:
> We're running Oracle 9 here, and it's even worse than vacuuming. Once a
> table grows, it stays grown until you rebuild it (you use the move
> command, you just don't move it), and if it's filled up it's tablespace,

It's been a while since I touched the Beast, but does this unused
space significantly impact performance in the way it does with
PostgreSQL?

Alexander.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ketema 2007-05-02 16:50:58 Re: multidimensional arrays
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2007-05-02 15:59:19 Re: Postgres (selection of thesis topic)