Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2010-10-12 22:21:32
Message-ID: 8899.1286922092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> Here's a new version of the patch, deprecating pg_parse_and_rewrite.

I started looking at this patch, and I'm wondering why you inserted all
the Register/UnregisterSnapshot calls that weren't there before (eg, why
did spi.c have to change at all?). ISTM either these are not necessary,
or there is a pre-existing snapshot management bug that's independent
of the question of just when to take new snapshots. I couldn't find
anything in the thread claiming the latter though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mladen Gogala 2010-10-12 22:30:38 Re: Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Neil Whelchel 2010-10-12 22:21:31 Re: Slow count(*) again...