Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong
Date: 2007-09-11 16:20:24
Message-ID: 8850.1189527624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
> Actually, in the log file I also see some messages about has_seq_search:

> ERROR: too many active hash_seq_search scans
> ERROR: too many active hash_seq_search scans
> ERROR: too many active hash_seq_search scans

BTW, I just made a commit to include the hash table name in this
message. Could you update src/backend/utils/hash/dynahash.c and retry
the test? I suspect it'll say the bgwriter's pending-ops table, but
we should verify that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-09-11 16:22:34 Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2007-09-11 16:15:21 Re: invalidly encoded strings