Re[4]: Postgres is too slow?

From: Paul <magamos(at)mail(dot)ru>
To: Alex Pilosov <alex(at)pilosoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re[4]: Postgres is too slow?
Date: 2001-06-22 12:54:16
Message-ID: 88338336.20010622185416@mail.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

AP> Questions:
AP> a) which linux kernel version is it?
AP> b) what kind of a disk is it? IDE or SCSI?
AP> c) what raw speed do you from the disk? do
AP> 'time dd if=/dev/hdxxx of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000'

HDD is IDE - Quantum lct10, 5400 rpm - yes, it's slow.
But I compared with MSSQL on the same PC with the same HDD...

# cat </proc/version
Linux version 2.2.16 (root(at)pm) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #5 Thu Dec 7 15:34:44 YEKT 2000

# time dd if=/dev/hda3 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out

real 3m33.731s
user 0m0.020s
sys 2m37.960s

# hdparm /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
multcount = 0 (off)
I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit)
unmaskirq = 0 (off)
using_dma = 0 (off)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
nowerr = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 8 (on)
geometry = 2482/255/63, sectors = 39876480, start = 0

# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
4096

# ipcs -l -s

------ Semaphore Limits --------
max number of arrays = 128
max semaphores per array = 250
max semaphores system wide = 32000
max ops per semop call = 100
semaphore max value = 32767

# ipcs -l -m

------ Shared Memory Limits --------
max number of segments = 128
max seg size (kbytes) = 131072
max total shared memory (kbytes) = 16777216
min seg size (bytes) = 1

Posmaster runned as:
$ postmaster -B 8000 -D /sql/data

vmstat's results during my SQL request
# vmstat
procs memory swap io system cpu
r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id
1 0 0 0 2036 68216 23652 0 0 199 2 1712 44 1 22 78

--
Best regards,
Paul mailto:magamos(at)mail(dot)ru

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Pilosov 2001-06-22 13:10:02 Re: Re[4]: Postgres is too slow?
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2001-06-22 12:24:28 Re: Suggested improvement : Adjust SEQUENCES to accept an INCREMENT of functionname(parameters) instead of an integer