"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Please, DO NOT MOVE position of page version in PageHeader structure! And
>>> PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION should be bump to 5.
>> Umm, any in-place upgrade should be capable of handling changes to the
>> page header. Of, did I miss something significant in the in-place
> I thought that was kind of the point of in place upgrade.
Sure, but he has to have a reliable way to tell what version of the page
header he's looking at...
What I'm wondering though -- are we going to make CRCs mandatory? Or set aside
the 4 bytes even if you're not using them? Because if the size of the page
header varies depending on whether you're using CRCs that sounds like it would
be quite a pain.
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-10-30 15:14:34|
|Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks |
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-10-30 15:11:21|
|Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks|