| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
| Date: | 2008-10-30 15:11:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20081030151121.GC3857@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera napsal(a):
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>>> But perhaps writing a single WAL record if you scan whole page and set
>>> all bits at once. Then it makes sense in some cases.
>>
>> So this is what I ended up doing; attached.
>
> Please, DO NOT MOVE position of page version in PageHeader structure!
Hmm. The only way I see we could do that is to modify the checksum
struct member to a predefined value before calculating the page's
checksum.
Ah, actually there's another alternative -- leave the checksum on its
current position (start of struct) and move other members below
pg_pagesize_version (leaning towards pd_tli and pd_flags). That'd leave
the page version in the same position.
(Hmm, maybe it's better to move pd_lower and pd_upper?)
> And PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION should be bump to 5.
Easily done; thanks for the reminder.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| bufpage.h.patch | text/x-diff | 6.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-10-30 15:11:30 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-10-30 15:00:34 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |