Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?
Date: 2007-12-15 07:24:21
Message-ID: 87wsrgqv2y.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> On Dec 14, 2007 6:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> How do people feel about applying this to 8.3, rather than holding it?
>> One possible objection is that we're past string freeze, but I noted
>> Peter doing some message editorializing as recently as today, so it
>> would seem a slushy freeze at best.
>
> FWIW, I'm good with applying it to 8.3.

I think it would have been better to apply before beta. We would have found
out if users were going to complain about it. Perhaps we should do it for 8.4
instead

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message NikhilS 2007-12-15 07:32:51 Re: VLDB Features
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-12-15 06:12:58 Re: VLDB Features