Re: do we want to gitignore regression-test-failure files?

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: do we want to gitignore regression-test-failure files?
Date: 2010-09-27 08:06:20
Message-ID: 87vd5rehkz.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I don't find it indecipherable. We're ignoring stuff that can be
> expected to be present after a normal build and successful "make
> check" or "make installcheck". As soon as we ignore more than that,
> I'm going to insist on ignoring *~ ... do you want to open that can
> of worms?

Couldn't resist to note that $EDITOR might make it easy to divert the
backup files elsewhere (out-of-tree). For example:

(setq backup-directory-alist '((".*" . "~/.emacs.d/backups/")))

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marios Vodas 2010-09-27 08:26:59 gist access methods parameter types
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-09-27 08:05:38 Re: security label support, revised