Re: some missing internationalization in pg_basebackup

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: some missing internationalization in pg_basebackup
Date: 2011-08-16 09:35:10
Message-ID: 87r54lvgvl.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Note that the progress indicator will *always* count wrong when you
> choose to include WAL, since we just don't know how much WAL there
> should be. I guess in this case we could just advance the "end
> counter" as well as we go, making sure it doesn't shoot above 100%.
>
> Does that seem reasonable?

Yes. If you're interested into the progress being made and the goal is
moving, it's better to know about that.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-08-16 09:51:33 Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage
Previous Message Jeevan Chalke 2011-08-16 09:30:59 Allowing same cursor name in nested levels