| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Reduce pinning in btree indexes |
| Date: | 2015-02-27 11:10:54 |
| Message-ID: | 87pp8v62bf.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Kyotaro" == Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
Kyotaro> Anyway I'm sorry but I have left my dev env and cannot have
Kyotaro> time till next week.
The point is moot; rather than try and explain it further I did the test
myself, and the performance penalty of disabling mark/restore is
substantial, on the order of 30%, so that's a non-starter. (I was a bit
surprised that it was so bad...)
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey Shchukin | 2015-02-27 11:11:14 | Re: Re: [pgadmin-support] Issue with a hanging apply process on the replica db after vacuum works on primary |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2015-02-27 10:21:01 | Re: Reduce pinning in btree indexes |