Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Fixing this properly is a research project, and I haven't thought of any
> quick-and-dirty hacks that aren't too ugly to consider :-(
Just thinking out loud here. Instead of trying to peek inside the CASE
couldn't the optimizer just wrap the non-strict expression in a conditional
that tests whether the row was found?
--
greg