Re: The case of PostgreSQL on NFS Server

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The case of PostgreSQL on NFS Server
Date: 2010-06-24 16:21:03
Message-ID: 87mxukfllc.fsf@cbbrowne-laptop.afilias-int.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

shikase(at)air(dot)co(dot)jp (Iwao Shikase) writes:
> If I mount the database cluster with caching in my environment, What kind of
>  problem I will meet? Please give the information about the problem you met.

If you use NFS, and are not absolutely certain of the semantics of the
implementation, then you are accepting the risk that in case of a
crash (for nearly any reason), your database may wind up destroyed.

Let me say that more directly:

The kind of problem you may meet is that your database may be
destroyed.

Few people have sufficient confidence in the semantics of their NFS
implementations, and the use of NFS is generally not recommended, as a
consequence.
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/unix.html
In case you weren't aware, "ad homineum" is not latin for "the user of
this technique is a fine debater." -- Thomas F. Burdick

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sim Zacks 2010-06-24 16:31:55 Re: complicated running aggregate
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2010-06-24 16:14:44 Re: HA for PostgreSQL (Auth-Server)