Re: Fix corner case for binary upgrade: extension functions in pg_catalog.

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix corner case for binary upgrade: extension functions in pg_catalog.
Date: 2011-02-17 08:57:13
Message-ID: 87mxlv3uom.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
>> Tom Lane <post(at)gwene(dot)org> writes:
>>> Fix corner case for binary upgrade: extension functions in pg_catalog.
>
>> Do we only want to care about functions here?
>
> Yes. Functions/aggregates are the only object type where pg_dump tries
> to suppress fetching any information at all about system-owned objects;
> it's the only case where there's so many system objects as to be worth
> the trouble.

Makes for a nice localised fix. Thanks for explaining (again) :)

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-02-17 09:08:42 Re: Usability tweaks for extension commands
Previous Message Kohei Kaigai 2011-02-17 08:56:46 Re: sepgsql contrib module