Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend
Date: 2004-01-06 18:06:17
Message-ID: 87k745osti.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Unless anyone objects, I intend to apply this in 24 hours or so.

Patch applied.

-Neil

P.S. BTW, how does everyone feel about the methodology I've been using
for submitting and applying patches? The procedure I'm following is:

- for trivial / obviously correct patches, just apply them immediately

- for fairly simple patches, submit them to the list and apply them
fairly soon afterward (say, within 24 hours or 48 hours). When I
apply the patch, send another mail to wrap up the issue.

- for more complex stuff, the usual submission & review process until
the patch is ready to be applied.

If people don't want the additional mail when a patch is applied, I
can stop sending those to reduce the quantity of mail on -patches. I'm
also open to any other suggestions for procedural changes...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-06 18:23:43 Re: TODO list
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-01-06 17:43:44 Re: Paypal WAS: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON 2004

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-01-06 18:13:16 Re: minor smgr code cleanup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-06 17:38:29 Re: remove obsolete NULL casts