From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: remove 'noversion' from standalone backend |
Date: | 2004-01-06 18:06:17 |
Message-ID: | 87k745osti.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Unless anyone objects, I intend to apply this in 24 hours or so.
Patch applied.
-Neil
P.S. BTW, how does everyone feel about the methodology I've been using
for submitting and applying patches? The procedure I'm following is:
- for trivial / obviously correct patches, just apply them immediately
- for fairly simple patches, submit them to the list and apply them
fairly soon afterward (say, within 24 hours or 48 hours). When I
apply the patch, send another mail to wrap up the issue.
- for more complex stuff, the usual submission & review process until
the patch is ready to be applied.
If people don't want the additional mail when a patch is applied, I
can stop sending those to reduce the quantity of mail on -patches. I'm
also open to any other suggestions for procedural changes...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-01-06 18:23:43 | Re: TODO list |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-01-06 17:43:44 | Re: Paypal WAS: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON 2004 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-01-06 18:13:16 | Re: minor smgr code cleanup |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-06 17:38:29 | Re: remove obsolete NULL casts |