Re: RFD: hexstring(n) data type

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFD: hexstring(n) data type
Date: 2008-04-17 23:55:30
Message-ID: 87k5iwavf1.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I don't think we should define types based on how they print. We should define
types based on what they contain. bytea is a perfectly good datatype for
storing binary data, though perhaps we could use a bytea(n) for fixed size
binary data.

However bytea has an inconvenient string representation. Really I would prefer
if bytea were *always* read and written in hex format. We could have a guc to
enable this but it would make it hard to write code which would function
consistently as part of a larger application.

I think this is more akin to the MONEY data type. Really it would be better if
we could declare columns as NUMERIC but attach a "default format" to them for
use when string representation is desired. Similarly with bytea we could
choose a default string representation different from the default in/out
functions.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-17 23:56:16 Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-04-17 23:45:25 Re: Lessons from commit fest