Re: out-of-date comment in auto-generated oidjoins.sql

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: out-of-date comment in auto-generated oidjoins.sql
Date: 2008-10-13 14:06:44
Message-ID: 87iqrwr3m3.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> This file was moved lo, these many years
>
> Done ... but why did your patch change oidjoins.out and not oidjoins.sql?

I had other changes in my tree, I just diffed the files individually rather
than doing a cvs diff

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Mayfield 2008-10-13 14:15:00 Re: Building Postgres in Eclipse
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-13 13:56:55 Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... CYCLE in vanilla SQL: issues with arrays of rows