| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tony Marston" <tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard |
| Date: | 2008-10-15 01:56:51 |
| Message-ID: | 87fxmyboyk.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Tony Marston" <tony(at)marston-home(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I think your definition of "Feature T301 Functional Dependencies" is
> extremely questionable. ... If you support both key and non-key columns on a
> table then you support functional dependencies whether you like it or not.
An ISO/IEC 9075 conformant implementation must list in its documentation which
optional features it claims to support. Postgres does so at:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/features.html
In particular note that T301 is listed partway down this list:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/unsupported-features-sql-standard.html
> As soon as I point out an SQL standard that you DON'T follow I get a barrage
> of weasel words and pathetic excuses.
Well then.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Fabulich | 2008-10-15 02:08:12 | BUG #4479: Incorrect TSearch2 results when inserting after deleting |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-10-15 00:30:55 | Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard |