Re: Upcoming re-releases

From: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upcoming re-releases
Date: 2006-02-11 17:52:04
Message-ID: 87ek29941n.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Magnus Hagander:

> But no, it wouldn't be bad if there was a way to specify exactly which
> cert is used. Or at least validate the common name of it agains the
> hostname of the server.

SSH-like "leap of faith" authentication would be even better. Store
the certificate on the first connection (together with the domain
name), and refuse subsequent connections if the certificate changes.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-02-11 18:10:23 Re: Analyze and vacuum, they are sort of mandatory....
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-11 17:46:43 Re: Scrollable cursors and Sort performance