Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <Josh(dot)Berkus(at)Sun(dot)COM>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
Date: 2007-10-29 22:18:17
Message-ID: 87ejfdd0pi.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> writes:

> What I was referring to, was a "code cleanup" of libpq several years
> ago, when someone (maybe Bruce IIRC) removed ability to accept multiple
> recordsets from backend altogether, on the basis that it is not used
> anyway.

You can still receive multiple record sets just fine using libpq. psql doesn't
handle them but they're there. When I was doing the concurrent psql patch I
also had it handling multiple record sets.

Something else you may be thinking of, I don't think it's legal to do queries
like "select 1 ; select 2" in the new protocol. That was legal in the old
protocol.

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-10-29 22:32:11
Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
Previous:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2007-10-29 21:58:20
Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group