From:
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To:
"Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Cc:
"David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <Josh(dot)Berkus(at)Sun(dot)COM>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
Date:
2007-10-29 22:18:17
Message-ID:
87ejfdd0pi.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2007-10-27 11:40:42 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-10-27 12:43:17 from Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2007-10-27 13:36:10 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2007-10-27 13:57:01 from Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2007-10-27 14:44:16 from "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-10-27 19:55:46 from Josh Berkus <Josh(dot)Berkus(at)Sun(dot)COM>
2007-10-27 21:05:26 from Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
2007-10-27 21:10:21 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2007-10-29 01:18:04 from "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-10-29 01:22:46 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2007-10-29 21:58:20 from Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
2007-10-29 22:18:17 from Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2007-10-29 22:32:11 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2007-10-29 23:42:54 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2007-10-30 08:48:24 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-10-30 13:15:42 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2007-10-30 14:31:12 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2007-10-30 15:03:37 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2007-10-30 08:40:56 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-10-30 14:24:20 from "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>
2007-10-30 15:11:00 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2007-10-30 19:19:56 from "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-10-29 22:32:44 from James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
2007-10-30 14:33:19 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2007-10-30 15:06:18 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2007-10-27 14:01:15 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-10-27 14:18:11 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2007-10-27 14:45:47 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-10-27 20:22:10 from Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
2007-10-27 21:33:34 from "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2007-11-05 03:51:01 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2008-04-11 19:38:53 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
"Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> writes:
> What I was referring to, was a "code cleanup" of libpq several years
> ago, when someone (maybe Bruce IIRC) removed ability to accept multiple
> recordsets from backend altogether, on the basis that it is not used
> anyway.
You can still receive multiple record sets just fine using libpq. psql doesn't
handle them but they're there. When I was doing the concurrent psql patch I
also had it handling multiple record sets.
Something else you may be thinking of, I don't think it's legal to do queries
like "select 1 ; select 2" in the new protocol. That was legal in the old
protocol.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-10-29 22:32:11Subject : Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)Previous :From : Hannu KrosingDate : 2007-10-29 21:58:20Subject : Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
