Re: datestyle GUC broken in HEAD?

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: datestyle GUC broken in HEAD?
Date: 2007-03-25 19:12:09
Message-ID: 87d52x2l4m.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> What's your point?

Apparently my point is that I should have checked the docs before assuming I
understood how this variable worked. I guess I've never needed to touch it
before.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-25 20:07:18 Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-25 19:09:43 Re: Idea for cleaner representation of snapshots