Re: Really bad blowups with hash outer join and nulls

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Really bad blowups with hash outer join and nulls
Date: 2015-06-01 18:39:07
Message-ID: 87d21fi8bj.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> writes:

Jim> Anything happen with this, or the patch Andrew posted?

No.

And my attention has just been drawn to this, which looks like the same
issue:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52B47B47-0926-4E15-B25E-212DF52FE695@oseberg.io

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-06-01 19:31:25 Re: Join Filter vs. Index Cond (performance regression 9.1->9.2+/HEAD)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-01 18:22:32 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1