Re: Corrupt RTREE index

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Corrupt RTREE index
Date: 2004-12-14 05:40:54
Message-ID: 87acshv3mh.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > So you don't think this case is worth doing forensics on?
>
> If the problem goes away after REINDEX then I'll write it off as missing
> WAL support. rtree is not high enough on my list of priorities to
> justify more effort :-(

Fwiw, the problem went away after REINDEX.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2004-12-14 06:00:45 Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-12-14 05:32:46 Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field