Re: 8.2 beta blockers

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 beta blockers
Date: 2006-09-18 10:45:21
Message-ID: 87ac4xv4fy.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Quoth tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane):
> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
>> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) wrote:
>>> I see the following items standing between us and putting out 8.2beta1:
>>> * AIX linking issues
>
>> This has to do with the discussion about shared vs static libs?
>
>> If a patch is put out, it'll get build-farm results on AIX within a
>> couple hours.
>
> Yeah, I know, which is why I don't find it absolutely critical that
> this make it to beta1. But one of the concerns mentioned in the thread
> is that the changes might break things for older AIX versions. If we
> get it into beta1, we have a better chance of finding out before release
> whether there are any issues with AIX versions that aren't represented
> in buildfarm.

Well, systems running elder versions of AIX are doing so without any
IBM support. AIX 5.1 is no longer supported...

I'd have a problem with running any of those elder versions due to the
absence of support, myself...
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "gmail.com")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/nonrdbms.html
"Microsoft is a cross between the Borg and the Ferengi. Unfortunately,
they use Borg to do their marketing and Ferengi to do their
programming." -- Simon Slavin in asr

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-09-18 11:13:45 Re: guc comment changes (was Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta)
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2006-09-18 09:29:03 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for UUID datatype (beta)