Re: [HACKERS] 5 Weeks till feature freeze or (do you know where your patch is?)

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PgSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 5 Weeks till feature freeze or (do you know where your patch is?)
Date: 2007-02-24 00:39:05
Message-ID: 87abz4ie3a.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Greg Stark: WITH/Recursive Queries?
>
> Uhm, I posted two weeks ago saying I had to shelve that temporarily.
>
> On the other hand I've submitted a patch to reduce the storage overhead of
> varlenas under 128 bytes by 3-7 bytes each.

oops, that's actually 3-6 bytes.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2007-02-24 00:48:39 Re: Ruby on Rails for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Richard Broersma Jr 2007-02-24 00:14:55 Re: postgresql vs mysql

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-02-24 01:15:05 Re: Proposal for Implenting read-only queries during wal replay (SoC 2007)
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-02-24 00:30:29 Re: SCMS question