From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PgSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 5 Weeks till feature freeze or (do you know where your patch is?) |
Date: | 2007-02-24 00:39:05 |
Message-ID: | 87abz4ie3a.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Greg Stark: WITH/Recursive Queries?
>
> Uhm, I posted two weeks ago saying I had to shelve that temporarily.
>
> On the other hand I've submitted a patch to reduce the storage overhead of
> varlenas under 128 bytes by 3-7 bytes each.
oops, that's actually 3-6 bytes.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2007-02-24 00:48:39 | Re: Ruby on Rails for PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Richard Broersma Jr | 2007-02-24 00:14:55 | Re: postgresql vs mysql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-02-24 01:15:05 | Re: Proposal for Implenting read-only queries during wal replay (SoC 2007) |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-02-24 00:30:29 | Re: SCMS question |