Re: invalidly encoded strings

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: invalidly encoded strings
Date: 2007-09-10 08:04:54
Message-ID: 87abrvvtcp.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
>
>> I think the concern is when they use only one slash, like:
>> E'\377\000\377'::bytea
>> which, as I mentioned before, is not correct anyway.

Wait, why would this be wrong? How would you enter the three byte bytea of
consisting of those three bytes described above?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message db 2007-09-10 08:45:59 Re: invalidly encoded strings
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2007-09-10 07:29:52 Re: invalidly encoded strings

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-09-10 08:17:18 Re: HOT patch - version 15
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-09-10 08:03:07 Re: HOT patch - version 15