Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-20 22:38:55
Message-ID: 877ipyfdz4.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:

> I suppose the idea is that we don't want to be sloppy about accepting
> just anything in postgresql.conf.

becuase?

> I think people are worried that an 'm' in one column might mean something
> different than an 'm' in another column, and perhaps that is confusing.

To whom? the person writing it?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2007-06-20 22:45:51 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-06-20 22:21:41 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent