Re: Pgsql (and mysql) benchmark on T2000/Solaris and some

From: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
To: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pgsql (and mysql) benchmark on T2000/Solaris and some
Date: 2006-05-18 05:39:01
Message-ID: 8764k3uc22.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

* Jignesh K. Shah:

> * llseek is high which means you can obviously gain a bit with the
> right file system/files tuning by caching them right.

It might also make sense to switch from lseek-read/write to
pread/pwrite. It shouldn't be too hard to hack this into the virtual
file descriptor module.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory S. Williamson 2006-05-18 07:56:57 Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2006-05-17 19:40:59 Re: [PERFORM] Performance incorporate with JReport