| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 小波 顾 <guxiaobo1982(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>, chris(dot)ellis(at)shropshire(dot)gov(dot)uk, "pgsql-general\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql? |
| Date: | 2008-10-30 22:01:10 |
| Message-ID: | 8763n9bv4p.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm sure this makes for a nice brochure or power point presentation,
> but in the real world I can't imagine putting that much effort into it
> when compressed file systems seem the place to be doing this.
I can't really see trusting Postgres on a filesystem that felt free to
compress portions of it. Would the filesystem still be able to guarantee that
torn pages won't "tear" across adjacent blocks? What about torn pages that
included hint bits being set?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-30 22:03:52 | Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql? |
| Previous Message | Christophe | 2008-10-30 21:57:58 | Re: Decreasing WAL size effects |