Re: BTree tid operators and opclass

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BTree tid operators and opclass
Date: 2006-07-07 05:16:51
Message-ID: 873bdenge4.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > Here's a small patch to add the full suite of btree operators for tids and the
> > corresponding btree opclass.
>
> This has been proposed and rejected before, mainly on the basis that
> there's no conceivable application for an index on TID. What's your
> use case?

IIRC the use case that was previously suggested was the common Oracle idiom
for removing duplicates. The Postgrse equivalent would something like:

delete from tab where exists (
select 1 from tab as x where x.pk = tab.pk and x.ctid > tab.ctid
)

In my case I don't want to create an index on tid, I just have a list of tids
that I want to sort so I can process them in heap order.

I was going to just write a qsort comparator but this way I can use tuplesort
and not worry about what happens if it doesn't fit in memory.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-07-10 15:01:51 Win32 DEF file error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-07 04:16:21 Re: BTree tid operators and opclass