Re: [PATCHES] LDAP auth

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: "Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] LDAP auth
Date: 2006-03-06 15:51:25
Message-ID: 871wxfpo5e.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at> writes:

> If your patch is accepted and a dependency on OpenLDAP is introduced,
> my patch will provide an additional gain with no additional cost.

Out of curiosity what would an SQL database want with ldap anyways?
Is it just a set of bindings for ldap functions for applications?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2006-03-06 16:04:12 Re: [PATCHES] LDAP auth
Previous Message David Boreham 2006-03-06 15:39:24 Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL