Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-03 21:18:41
Message-ID: 871v3o3jgu.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com (Mladen Gogala) writes:
> I must say that this purist attitude is extremely surprising to
> me. All the major DB vendors support optimizer hints, yet in the
> Postgres community, they are considered bad with almost religious
> fervor.
> Postgres community is quite unique with the fatwa against hints.

Well, the community declines to add hints until there is actual
consensus on a good way to add hints.

Nobody has ever proposed a way to add hints where consensus was arrived
at that the way was good, so...
--
http://linuxfinances.info/info/nonrdbms.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #192. "If I appoint someone as my consort,
I will not subsequently inform her that she is being replaced by a
younger, more attractive woman. <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-02-03 21:24:51 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Previous Message Mladen Gogala 2011-02-03 21:01:40 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-03 21:29:25 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Mladen Gogala 2011-02-03 21:01:40 Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...