Re: Minor "pre-bug" in gram.y for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF_P EXISTS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brendan Byrd <Perl(at)ResonatorSoft(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Minor "pre-bug" in gram.y for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF_P EXISTS
Date: 2012-08-27 15:42:40
Message-ID: 870.1346082160@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Brendan Byrd <Perl(at)ResonatorSoft(dot)org> writes:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/parser/gram.y;hb=master#l4940
> The "missing_ok" property should be true.

[ rolls eyes ] Apparently that patch wasn't ever, you know, tested?

Will fix, thanks for spotting it!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-27 16:21:39 Re: unsigned and signed chars in libpq API
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-27 15:07:55 Re: [GENERAL] Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?