Re: Web application: Programming language/Framework: Summary

From: merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz)
To: Arthur van Dorp <arthur_vd(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Dino Vliet <dino_vliet(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Web application: Programming language/Framework: Summary
Date: 2004-08-18 20:01:28
Message-ID: 86r7q4tduv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "Arthur" == Arthur van Dorp <arthur_vd(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:

Arthur> And I can assure you that there
Arthur> are many many more frameworks around. So many that I wonder whether I
Arthur> shouldn't just write my own, it must be very simple that almost
Arthur> everyone has done so.

If I can give you some insight from the Perl world (where there are 57
different templating systems and counting)...

It's very *easy* to start a framework. It gets harder to hit that
80/20 point, where you're using it more than fiddling with it. It
gets *really* hard to make it general enough for others to use it
outside your direct range of experience.

For example, TemplateToolkit (on which OpenFrame is based, and
Bricolage will at least nod to, and on which Slashcode depends) took a
hella lot of work, and thus begins to be the thing everyone can use.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2004-08-18 20:20:55 Re: scripting & psql issues
Previous Message Arthur van Dorp 2004-08-18 19:30:36 Re: Web application: Programming language/Framework: Summary