Re: MVCC doc improvements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MVCC doc improvements
Date: 2002-12-17 16:35:56
Message-ID: 8667.1040142956@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> This patch improves the MVCC documentation: I added some additional
> discussion of deadlock conditions, removed a mis-statement about index
> locking, and made minor edits in a couple other places.

> - </para>
> -
> - <para>
> - In short, B-tree indexes are the recommended index type for concurrent
> - applications.
> </para>

AFAICS, that is not a misstatement. B-trees are still the only
recommended index type for concurrent-update situations ...
hash has deadlock issues and the other two are just plain not
concurrent.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-12-17 16:43:21 Re: MVCC doc improvements
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-12-17 16:28:12 Re: documentation improvements