Re: pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests
Date: 2008-05-29 23:19:45
Message-ID: 8641.1212103185@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway <Jorgen(dot)Austvik(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The RPM packages have done this since approximately forever. You might
>> want to look at the patches used there.

> yes [1] is the same that we have been using internally.

> Let me reformulate my question: would it be better to include something
> like the attached patch in PostgreSQL, than have every distributor of
> the tests apply it?

> [1]
> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/postgresql/F-9/postgresql-test.patch?rev=1.3&view=auto

I never particularly thought it would be useful to push that patch
upstream, but certainly it would make life a tad simpler for Devrim and
me. Since nobody else has objected, I'll look into doing this in HEAD.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-30 00:14:30 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-05-29 23:12:22 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL