Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> But I wonder whether any better answer is possible. I don't want to
>> give up on the inlining optimization --- anyone see another fix?
> Include an option for function definitions to not allow the function
> being defined to be inlined.
Seems pretty ugly. I was wondering how much it would cost to run the
index's function definition through the inliner before comparing ...
regards, tom lane