Re: problem with volatile functions in subselects ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problem with volatile functions in subselects ?
Date: 2006-09-03 03:49:37
Message-ID: 8601.1157255377@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> If we do it, basically the response to anyone who complains about loss
>> of performance should be "fix your function to be marked stable or
>> immutable, as appropriate".

> Agreed. Are we doing this, or is it a TODO?

It's done:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-08/msg00358.php

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 03:52:07 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-03 03:46:45 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta