Re: Named transaction

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Named transaction
Date: 2009-06-17 17:47:34
Message-ID: 860.1245260854@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> AFAIK that's an "autonomous transaction", at least to some other RDBMSs.

> Right, but since I had to ask what that was recently I though I'd use a
> bit more description :-)

Yes, but some other followups suggest that maybe a "named transaction"
does something else entirely. Thus my request for a definition of what
the OP is actually asking for.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-06-17 19:04:16 Re: Named transaction
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-06-17 17:45:30 Re: Named transaction